October 4, 2015 (reposted from the old AK blog archive 8/16/2020)
Essay Three
And then there is the “formula” that leads our single degree of freedom overunity sink biomind, using a hologramic process, to produce a “thing” (or 4-spacetime quantum object) out of no-thing (or its quantum potential templaic conformation). This formula is an algorithm or, as we described in a previous essay, “a certain sort of formal process that can be counted on logically to yield a certain sort of result whenever it is ‘run’ or instantiated,” Daniel C. Dennett (“Darwin’s Dangerous Idea”, Simon & Schuster, 1995, pp. 50-51). We also said (1) an algorithm has substrate neutrality, (2) an underlying mindlessness, and (3) guaranteed results.
To remind you, the substrate or basic neutrality of an algorithm allows you to use the underlying procedure on anything it can be applied to, using any logical system you want. The power of the procedure is due to its logical structure, not just the causal powers of the materials used in the instantiation, just so long as those causal powers permit the prescribed steps to be followed exactly.
The mindlessness of the prescribed steps is what makes the algorithm logical, because the logic of the steps and their sequencing are simple. An algorithm worked out by you for you will not necessarily work for me or for your mate, or for Jaime. The KEY here is that algorithms are as personal as the imprints on your iris or the patterns on your fingerprints. What you will obtain in this module is a sure-fire process you need to “translate” to your body and biomind, and the strange part will be (albeit new to you) exhilarating to your biomind, for it gets to awaken or “express” a function already inscribed in your DNA, and this your biomind knows deeply. Trust your biomind, for it will correct you in your interpretation of what is written here you must do to create the necessary internal and external conditions along each required “phase” or “step” in the sequence of your actions. In a manner of speaking, it knows better than the ego-personality you think is you.
The “sequence” or “steps” described here will be given in as generic a language set as possible, for your interpretation of what is written is THE most crucial aspect of this endeavor. As first impressions are lasting, so are first imprints (or interpretations given by the mind for processes and procedures it wishes the body to comply and perform).
It is here that we can help with, for in writing this module, we had to revisit our first times and the “newbie” moments of others who have performed MPO-LERM feats.
REPLICATION
Can you imagine now a real Star Trek-type replicator capable of replicating a nice fish dish, or a delicious apple pie, or a turkey and cheese sandwich on rye bread? We are sure you can, but are we asking the right question on this matter? Perhaps not. If a replicator is possible, what does it mean in terms of creating objects out of thin air? Is the object replicated a duplication, imitation, copy, or reproduction? Is the object you wish to light-encode its matrix as product a replication, duplication, imitation of another, copy, or reproduction?
First, let’s state the obvious, and then explore the quantum meaning of things. It means that an object in spacetime has a quantum potential template, and both the object and the quantum template are information sets that can be grasped, captured, and stored in a suitable medium. This also means the replicator must have quantum computing capabilities and the ability to read and recognize the quantum numbers of any macro-quantum object.
What, really, are these quantum numbers denoting and describing? What aspect of the object – a cell phone, an apple, money? They are denoting and describing the macroquantum object itself. We will explain that further below. Human beings, in their Meissner fields and living matrices, already have quantum computing capabilities inscribed and mostly latent.
In the case of us human complex oscillating biological entity; we have Meissner anti-Meissner
nonionizing fields surrounding our bodies at 90 degrees perpendicular and away from the surfaces of the body, and these fields within fields function as our memory and information processing capacities well beyond our cortical awareness. Animals and plants also have Meissner-antiMeissner fields, but do not appear to have the capacity to extend anti-Meissner harmonics.* Non ionizing fields emitted by the living matrices of any living system on Earth would qualify as Meissner range fields, as their electromagnetic range lies within the extremely low frequencies (ELF) of 1 Hz and 1560 Hz, though mostly from 1 Hz to 120 Hz. However, simply because the human Meissner field expressions are low-powered cellurar maxima of approximately 1.2 volts per cell, the total possible output of a human being as overunity sink is about one quadrillion volts, taking into consideration the total cellular capacitance of the body. And this capacitance level is sufficient to MPO-LERM most anything we want.
Each target is also a quantum macro-object, with a geometric form in 4-spacetime and a fuzzy form (with a geometry of its own) in quantum potential. As you LERM an MPOed object, the “visualization” of the target object is on the physical object. However, the overunity sink (i.e., the enteric brain complex in the ventral area of the human body) is focused on the quantum potential templaic conformation of the 4-dimensional target object. The moment you lock your visual vector-intention on your target object in 4-spacetime, the quantum potential templaic lock occurs automatically. You don’t have to do anything consciously for this to happen; your enteric complex performs that function for you beyond normal awareness. Replication, in this instance, and by the use of this algorithmic arrangement, is light-encoding by the “mirror-action” of one template (quantum potential) so that the other (4-spacetime) template can manifest as macro-quantum object. Let’s examine an example, and this may help you understand this seeming “dance” of one template with the other in a kind of Texas two-step.
Take a look at the picture on the right. This is a graphic representation of a fuzzy boundary geometrized quantum-potential template of an orange. A way of understanding this graphic representation (which is not identical or isomorphic to what neurosensors “see” when they look at the quantum-potential templaic conformation of a 4-dimensional orange) is to think of the templaic conformation as having five “dimensions” – four dimensions of space and one dimension of time, in a ratio of space/time that makes possible and easy the light-encoding of this conformation and manifesting it as the fruit we know as orange.
So when you think hologramically about the orange you visualize in your mind as 4-dimensional, do you have to worry about the 5-dimensional quantum-potential templaic conformation of the orange? No, you don’t. But you need to obey one rule of all holomovement in the Unum: the Texas two-step has to be danced backward; that is, you start out allowing your MPO to light-encode the reality-orange at its thought-matrix from its physical (or 4-dimensional) center outward. Every MPO we have filmed shows this unique pattern of manifestation. It doesn’t matter where in the world you are, the same thing happens – from the inside to the outside. This is an important piece of information. Remember it.
So when you think hologramically about the orange you visualize in your mind as 4-dimensional, do you have to worry about the 5-dimensional quantum-potential templaic conformation of the orange? No, you don’t. But you need to obey one rule of all holomovement in the Unum: the Texas two-step has to be danced backward; that is, you start out allowing your MPO to light-encode the reality-orange at its thought-matrix from its physical (or 4-dimensional) center outward. Every MPO we have filmed shows this unique pattern of manifestation. It doesn’t matter where in the world you are, the same thing happens – from the inside to the outside. This is an important piece of information. Remember it.
HOW HUMAN COBEs DO MAGIC: QUANTUM NUMBERS AND LIGHTENCODING
How is this encoding done? Above, we mentioned quantum numbers of any macro-quantum
object. There are four of them:
Amazingly, enteric information processing functions perform all necessary calculations to know precisely where in spacetime to begin light-encoded manifestation by following the “framework” provided by the “mirror dance” of the two templates (4-spacetime and quantum-potential) mentioned above. How we “know” how to do such things is at this time still beyond our understanding. The materialization of ANY object lies within these four numbers and how their values are manipulated to accommodate transmuted light into elementary particles (electrons, specifically) and atoms from these. All of what follows here is a mere reminder of what you already know “in your gut” (no pun intended).
Quantum Numbers. Your enteric information processing function calculates the n and L values automatically, determining the kind of atom, the number of orbits each will need to have, and the atom’s azimuthal quantum number or value of quantum angular momentum. In the chemistry of the LERMed object, this quantum number is very important, since it specifies the shape of its atomic
orbitals and strongly influences chemical bonds and bond angles. These two numbers then produce the sequence of orbitals or wavefunction for all atoms of each kind required to collocate in the matter of which the object is made. It also tells your gut how much and what strength of energy to use to encode what is needed, where it is needed. The magnetic quantum number tells you the quantum state of an electron and denotes the energy level within a subshell in the electron cloud of circling electrons. The spin quantum number gives the value of the spin of a particle. When the spectral lines of the hydrogen spectrum are examined at very high resolution, they are found to be closely-spaced
doublets. This splitting is called fine structure and was one of the first experimental evidences for electron spin. The direct observation of the electron’s intrinsic angular momentum was achieved in the Stern-Gerlach experiment.
When the idea of electron spin was first introduced in 1925, even Wolfgang Pauli had trouble accepting Ralph Kronigs model. The problem was not that a rotating charged particle would have given rise to a magnetic field, but that the electron was so small that the equatorial speed of the electron would have to be greater than the speed of light for the magnetic moment to be of the observed strength. Throughout the LERMing process, the encoding of light energy is very much as if an invisible quantum computer were “writing” the object into existence. We say “invisible” because so far we don’t quite understand how the computing capacities of the human biomind enteric complex works. We know it does, and does very well.
Quantum numbers describe the electron energies in the atoms of an object. The question of how many quantum numbers are needed to describe any given object has no consistent and universal answer, because for each target object our enteric complex “quantum biocomputer” must find the answer for a full analysis of the object’s system. So, in 1930, French mathematician Paul Dirac
developed a new version of the Schrödinger Wave Equation which was relativistically invariant, and predicted the magnetic moment correctly, and at the same time treated the electron as a point particle. In the Dirac equation all four quantum numbers including the additional quantum number s arose
naturally during its solution. And all of these calculations are performed by the biomind for every atom to be collocated as light-encoded atomic matter in the object’s quantum-potential/4-spacetime mirror-matrices!
MORE MAGIC: BIOGENETIC BASIS OF LERM-MPO or THE BIOMIND MINDING THE BODY
Interesting also that DNA plays an important, some would say crucial, role in the LERM of an MPO. This is not just human DNA affecting cells of one’s body, but also language affecting DNA itself. Moreover, our decipherment of DNA/environment interaction from what is predicted by the Working Model (see Foundation Reports in Life Physics, Vol 1, No. 1 essays) indicates that information bandwidths (electromagnetic ionizing, EM nonionizing, sound, electroluminescent) play a role in DNA expression, modifications, and retrofitting. Imagine this: take the information bandwidth of the fertilized gamete of a rat and transmit that to the fertilized gamete of a gerbil and what do you get as a result? A rat born to a gerbil. This has been done in our labs and reproduced in Russia a few years ago. We also found that just about everything has a”languaging system” unique to itself: DNA responds to sound and to EM (ionizing and nonzionizing) and scalar (or beyond the EM) energetics. You can literally talk to your cells and change their DNA. You can also talk to the cells of another person and change them, too. It is all in the frequency ranges you use to communicate not just meaning, but also sound. Do your cells understand words? Better than you and in all of their denotations and connotations.
“exist” there for a while in a kind of extension-visit while keyed to our physical body? Yes. And this is the basis of extension neurosensing. How far can we “go” on these extension “tours”? By our calculations, it seems we are capable of extending some 30 billion light years without breaking a sweat. This, by the way, gives new meaning to the saying, “the universe in a grain of sand, and the whole of creation in a thought.”
MPO
The entire algorithmic sequence that follows has grammar rules (or rules of manifestation), syntactic rules (or how to put things together to get the result desired), and semantic rules (or what words / meanings to use to activate the necessary aspect of the DNA in our living matrix). And the entire sequence is predicated on two single basic logic kernels: Everything thought is real. I am cause because I am thought.
GRAMMAR
1. Manifest production observership of any object’s reality matrix by light encodement depends upon your complete acceptance and ownership of the two logic kernels. Failure to do so will result in no result at all.
2. Thought is real and the cause of coherence of matter by the design of an existing template.
3. Biomind is cause by use of creational algorithm applied to specific product/moment. All results of such application(s) have to be declared as product-condensates in a horizontal time-moment.
4. Biomind operation of light-encodement is from alpha-point (in 4-spacetime) to the edge of the object’s 4-spacetime template; coherence encodement is along Planck limit points between 4-spacetime and quantum-potential templates as a threading-like back-and-forth dance.
5. Biomind operation of the fixing mechanism for alpha-point in spacetime is the physical pair of eyes of the operator, and the dish mechanism is one of the hands cupped in the general direction of the alpha-point.
6. Biomind operationalization of the sequence is the following of a set of discrete sequenced mental and physical actions adjusted to individual differences and personal idiosyncrasies, and directed at the biomind-caused materialization of a target object.
7. The biomind possesses a threshold knowledge base of the object whose 4-spacetime matrix is being light-encoded; on the basis of this direct and implied knowledge base about the target object will its templates (4-spacetime and quantum-potential) will the object supply a lack in material 4-dimensional reality fit to the world-demand characteristics necessary for the object to be consumed or used by the creator or the intended recipient.
SYNTAX & SEMANTIC HANDLES
The syntax of MPO-LERM is referred to as “result conveyors” (or simply, “conveyors). These are the psychophysiologies that make the biomind develop single degree of freedom (body functioning as a single whole) use of an overunity sink (above threshold nonionizing energetics at the cellular level) that is focused (hemispheric synchronization that allows clear internal stereoscopic visualization) upon an internal “canvas” projected onto a specific 4-dimensional spacetime location.
1. Single degree of freedom. The psychophysiology for this syntactic requirement is an individually determined level of relaxation. The level of relaxation must be keyed to a trigger word or phrase that will elicit the desired psychophysiological state by its mere utterance. This is the process used by the 40-year old baseball pitcher, main character of the film For The Love of the Game (played by Kevin Costner) to quiet down the noise level in the stadium just before a pitch – “Clear the mechanism.”
Once the trigger engages the desired psychophysiology and the body responds, the organismic response must be stabilized, and this calls for a semantic formula, immediately followed by a sound trigger for the development of an energetic overunity sink in the organism. The semantic formula must contained specific words with specific sounds, or specific sound in certain semantically meaningful and empowering words in the operator’s language – the language of the person engaging in MPO-LERM. The sounds which must be prevalent in the semantic message to the cells are mostly nasals, such as /n/, /m/, /ng/, /a/, /o/and /u/, and some fricatives such as /f/, /h/, /z/, /v/, /th/ and /sh/. Avoid too many plosives, like /b/, /t/, /d/, /k/, /g/. An example of an English language formula is shown below:
The formula is in the form of one or more statements designed to soothe the mind and establish by sound formulation and semantic message the expectancy set of what must come next – the onset of an overunity sink. The message does not have to be complete sentences. Phrases with power can also be used.
The rhythm of delivery is roughly one beat per second. Try intoning the formula above to the one-beat per second (1bps) rhythm suggested. Dedicate one meat per word, and consider “ummm” as a word. This the following delivery to the 1 bps rhythm.
1 Ummm time’s
2 – 3 – 4 come—again—mechanism’s on
5 – 6 – 7 full—force—rising
8 - 9 I’m—in my zone
10 -- 11 -- 12 I sing—a song—uu-ummm
13 -- 14 my force—is full
15 -- 16 my force—is full
17 -- 18 Ah-ha—Ah-ha
19 -- 20 My ummmm—song
20 -- 21 My ummmm—song
22 -- 23 in zone—is rising
24 -- 25 My force—is full
26 -- 27 My force—is full
28 -- 29 -- 30 I am—my force—in full.
The formula is designed as a child-like repetition of a known fact. Communication with cells must be in present tense as their time regime is only present-tense. The semantic content of the formula is actually an induction protocol for getting the cells prepped to engage in overunity energetics, or cellular capacitance beyond threshold (i.e., 1.2 volt per cell). The last thought in the sequence needs to be set up as cue to the development of overunity sink. At this moment, the operator must use the cue to bring the visual field of the target object to mind’s eye. And eyes are opened but focus is diffused, as attention is kept on the mind’s eye visual field containing the target object
2. Overunity Sink. The collection of overunity (or suprathreshold) energetics per cell is source to the single degree of freedom overunity, which becomes sink upon engaging visualization of target. In the cue moments, or the period of time the operator spends repeating the cue like a mantram, the cue must elicit the target object in a visual field before the operator’s mind’s eye. This must be done with eyes open but the focus of the physical eyes kept diffused such that the mind’s eye’s field is superposed upon the spacetime where the physical eyes are trained on. All of this needs to be done without any effort in the least,
Process can also be helped if the interested party engages the use of a “black light” source, specifically one capable of illuminating an operator’s biomind with UVA-UVB-UVC multirange ultraviolet light at low power. Best results can be had with semi-nude exposure in the 15-30 minute range, according to weight (roughly 1 minute per 5 pounds of weight). If use of this means is made, it is highly advisable to cover eyes either with a UVA-B-C- polarizing pair of sunglesses, or with an eye mask-like cover, to protect the eyes from harm.
Additionally, operator must also use the formula above (not the precise one shown, but one based upon its format and rhythm) that includes a verbal instruction to the cells to also derive energetics from the body’s epithelial (or skin) cells, from which all other cells may then draw on energetics to overunity.
At the start of practice, this entrainment procedure may take longer in generating desired results – increase in cellular capacitance. Also initially, many new practitioners do not know how to recognize an overunity internal state. Briefly, an overunity state is expressed holonomically in a variety of modes of experience – some feel as though ants are crawling inside in a not altogether unpleasant feeling, others feel “electric” along with a metallic taste in the mouth, still others can feel their hair in back of the neck rise along with other body hair in a sensation akin to being in a medium of high static electrical charge. Regardless of what the internal cues are, the internal event transpires in an internal medium of induced sensorial peace and quiet, as already described in previous modules.
3. Hemispheric-synchronized Visualization of Target Information Set. Another skill set necessary is the ability to visualize the target in a clear and concise manner, based on all available information pertinent to the target conformation and reality-matrix.
Different targets will have different information set requirements. Take, for instance, the assignment tasks presented below:
(1) A perfect, ripe sweet orange.
(2) A roll of WHITE cotton yarn.
(3) A present for your daughter or son or other member of the immediate family
(4) A digital photographic camera (your favorite brand)
Developing a Repertoire For LERMing Nonliving and Living Matrices. As most newbies, the reader would probably tend to think of self-sufficiency in terms of an ability to acquire necessities of life by purchasing power – that is, by having the money to buy and consume what you and your family need. LERM-MPO throws this usual and customary way of thinking and traditional behavior into disarray.
To LERM an MPO means being able to meet your needs without necessarily relying on acquisitive power by means of money. To LERM an MPO also requires you to develop a repertoire of types of things you for which you have affinity (by desire, belief, need, preference, proclivity and continuous use), and these things then become your LERM/MPO repertoire. Thus, in a manner of speaking, you can develop two kinds of repertoires on the basis of desire, belief, need, preference,proclivity, and continuous use.
Do you believe you can LERM a nonliving MPO target?
Do you believe you can LERM a living MPO target?
This is where the information set about a target begins. The options for answering this question are three, and only three. All other replies are variations of these three:
YES DON’T KNOW NO
If YES, you get to move to the DO stage, and get on with the LERM of your MPO. If NO, this belief is a barrier to your formulation of your MPO, since a manifest production observership is based on your belief that this process is possible and will result in a LERM of the object you desire, need, prefer, like and/use. And then, there is DON’T KNOW, which is not to mean MAYBE. At this juncture, it is necessary for you to know that the word-message MAYBE to your cells and to your enteric brain concerning the LERMing of a target object is quite damaging to desired results – that is, to getting the object’s reality matrix light-encoded as materialized object in 4-spacetime. MAYBE splits one’s vector-intention into a YES and a NO, and confuses the enteric brain into inaction. The worst thing to have is a neurotic enteric brain, trained into inaction by double messages and double entendres (meanings) (though, not necessarily of a risqué or sensual nature).
Most newbies either begin with a NO or a DON’T KNOW. Strangely enough, a NO is easier to reverse than a DON’T KNOW, but it is also the most fragile to negative results on first try.
NO is a clear vector-intention supported by belief and experience. It is also the most susceptible to change by information and mental representation supportive of the fact of LERM. It is also the most susceptible to the logic of everyday LERMing of one’s reality. NO is belief response dubiously supported by imagination. When imagination can be stolen away from NO support of the question, do you believe you can LERM a living or nonliving MPO object?, you then have the means to guide the vector-intention away from a negative and toward an imagination-borne possibility of how it can be done that can lead to a YES. As YES arrived at in this manner is a conditional YES, provided that the
process works the first time around, it requires a posited “proof.” When it does result in a positive proof, it is a triumph of ego-belief and personality-vector intention. Nothing wrong with this outcome. It is when it doesn’t that a NO turned-YES stance can lead to internal dissonance and self-castigation. The ones who wish to pull themselves up and move on to a new trial, do so and most, if
not all, produce one eventually.
What is not realized by newbies who reply in the negative or with a DON’T KNOW to the belief question is that each of them already perform LERM on all MPOs in their lives, including but not limited to their “individual reality.”
A DON’T KNOW stance on the belief question is initially most susceptible to demonstration by information set and knowledge instigation. These are the people who depend highly on their imagination to wrap their minds around an event deemed possible, or probable, by their manifest vector-intentions. It has been our experience that people who DON’T KNOW and who have inquiring minds are the best combination for LERM event acquisition.
We strongly suggest that you treat all targets as information sets. When moving onward on an information set to LERM its matrix, call on the matrix to complete the set with accurate information (though this is often not necessary, as the templates will not only initialize the process but also fill in the gap[s] once a target subjected to MPO is acted upon by LERM.
We will also advise you that attention deployment will also be a crucial element in the algorithmic sequence. There are four attention modalities: broad internal, narrow internal, broad external, and narrow external.
Broad internal – locating the site of a headache with sympathetic pains all over the head, getting a feel for bloated sensation, determining why you are unhappy. A deployment of attention to event or phenomenon inside that does not focus on any specific aspect but rather encompasses all or most of the event or phenomenon in its scope of perception.
Narrow internal – focusing on a mantram during Transcendental Meditation session, focusing on the precise site of pain anywhere in the body, focusing on your breathing or heartbeat. A deployment of attention to event or phenomenon that draws focus specifically on the event or phenomenon or on any specific aspect of it as its scope of perception.
Broad external – looking at a valley from a lookout point high up a hill, looking down from an airplane window to the ground, looking up at the ocean from a beach. A deployment of attention to event or phenomenon that focuses on a broad swath of space without stopping to focus on any one aspect as its scope of perception.
Broad internal – looking at a cut on someone else’s arm, touching or petting a dog or cat, looking for a familiar face on a photograph. A deployment of attention to an event or phenomenon that draws focus specifically on an aspect of it as itsscope of perception
In the course of the algorithmic sequence below, you will be using most, if not all, of the attention deployment modalities mentioned above.
4. Algorithmic Sequence. The elements in the algorithm are as follows:
Acknowledge need or desire to light encode the matrix of object desired or needed. Own need or desire. Declare need or desire in word to all quanta and request their cooperation in fact (i.e., in the world).
Focus on object(s) targeted and synthesize an awareness of object’s information set. Do this visually as observership act, i.e., by placing mentally or collocating image of target in the solar plexus area at an arm’s length at height of stomach in front of your body.
Once you have mentally collocated target image on “development plane” (i.e., the physical place at stomach height at arm’s length in front of you) at 90 degrees away from the belly button area, you let the area in which the object will manifest become the quantum-potential “cage” in which the QP template gathers up, with all the information set necessary to physically encode the object in 4-spacetime. During this QP template formation is the time you ask for and accept cooperation from all quanta that form the object’s QP template. And then ask the QP cage to tell you by knowingness when template formation is complete. Await reply/feedback, and when it comes, acknowledge and express gratefulness while accepting the template and owning it (meaning, you declare this template now as yours to do by your vector-intention). DO NOT forget to do this. This is an “interconnectivity lock” and assures flow both ways – from you to template and from template to you in the physical.
Now relax by calling in on the “mechanism” (a la Billy Sunday, the fictional ballplayer in the movie, “For The Love Of The Game”) and narrow internal locus of attention onto the QP template completed and in front of you in its glorious fuzzy form. Once you have the “mechanism” kick in bring in the formula into play. Claim and own point-of-being (body-mind as you are at this exact time) and state-of-peace (state of relaxation as you are at this exact time).
Recite the formula you compose to the rhythm count you designed. Use the formula example cited above as a recipe for your own. They have to contain your words, and you have to own your formula for it to work for you. From here onward, much of what you do depends on strong ownership and acceptance of what you do. Recite formula until you achieve rise to energetic overunity all over your body. Ask your body to provide you with confirming feedback by method you devise to communicate with it and recognize knowingness of overunity cellular electrical capacitance when it happen.
Monitor and feel/sense rise in cellular electrical capacitance while remaining peaceful and quiet during your formula recitation. Remain open to the confirming feedback and stay ready to the experience of knowingness that your body is to overunity. When the moment comes, acknowledge and express gratitude in your own words but internally and quietly.
Then tell your body to continue electrical capacitance increase or build up beyond threshold. Shift attention style from narrow internal to broad internal, and shift focus from awareness of energetic overunity to the feel of the energetic while vector-intentionally bringing the energetic sink (or hole through which you are going to ask cooperating quanta to “spray” the QP template with the right
type of wave-turned-particle in the process of commencing light encode procedure. Bring the sink to just below the belly button area and feel the “stream” as a spray, as if it was a water spout and it was comfortably and very relaxed filling up the QP template at arm’s length in front of your belly button
area. The important thing is to keep calm peace throughout this transition from overunity to sink energetic spraying,
Now you enlarge your broad internal attention to also include the target template at arm’s length in front of your belly button area, your energetic sink and the energetic overunity from all over your body. Once you have this awareness in mind, relaxed and peaceful, move to the next process.
Once you are aware of the target template, your energetic sink facing it, and the energetic overunity in your body, bring your vector-intention to bear on every cell in your body, issuing a vector-intentional knowingness to all cells to summate their energetics onto the energetic sink, letting “pressure” build as time goes by. (Internal & external time may not show isomorphic or one-to-one
correspondence at this stage in the process.) Ask your biomind to give you readiness feedback to start process of cooperative spray and materialization of 4-spacetime target object matrix. Ask this knowingness to be readily and easily understandable to you. When it comes and you recognize it, accept, express gratitude, own, and begin next phase.
Give instruction to your overunity sink to set up cooperative interconnectivity with flowing energetics at sink and direct flow of energetic stream to point alpha in the 4-spacetime location. Let the energetic stream conform the 4-spacetime matrix by light-encoding it from alpha point outward to object boundaries. Once this is complete, go inward to source, accept the object encoded, express your gratitude to your biomind and living matrix, and take physical possession of the object. End of algorithmic process.
PRACTICUM
A practicum is a practice period of time at a chosen place. It is a conscious activity brought under the control of our vector-intention. It is a choice and the consequence of its performance as chosen as well as of the product(s) derived from it. It also means you perform a practicum, and the performance of the practicum is the medium of the object of the practicum – much like as if the practicum were the carrier wave of another (the performance of the LERM of an MPO) piggybacking on it. Establishing PRACTICUM as a LERM ritual trains your biomind and organism to respond to the demand of performing LERM of a chosen MPO anywhere, anytime. It is strongly suggested to you that you adopt PRACTICUM as your private, intimate ritual to LERM a chosen target MPO.
FINALLY…
We come to the end of the LERM/MPO modules and its support physics. As you may have already surmised, much of what you have already read in these modules have other applications as well, just as LERM is not just an on-demand phenomenon but actually the basis of our creation of our individual and collective reality.
LERM, as an on-demand phenomenon, is as ancient as the time when the perfect DNA appeared in 4-spacetime, and began the panspermia of the universe. Human science at the start of the 21st century of the Common Era is at a threshold beyond its own conception. We are as gifted as any other life form in the known universe, more than some and less than others according to our stage of biomind evolvement at this juncture of our common history. We are also coming into our own, and the means to do so are at hand. TIA, LERM, MPO and other technologies that combine internal and external requisites and requirement assists are part of an ancient patrimony that is not even native to this galaxy. Yet we have it and we are harvesting its gifts and goodies. And we have just started.
THE AUTHORS
A. R. BORDON is a retired scientist and cofounder of the LIFE PHYSICS GROUP – CALIFORNIA. A former executive director of the American Association of Remote Viewers, he is an experienced physical-gnosive extension neurosensor and consultant to a private research institute in northern California.
E. M. WIENZ* is an active astrophysicist and computer scientist working for a private research institute in northern California, as well as with one of the national laboratories in the San Francisco Bay area. He is also a cofounder of the LIFE PHYSICS GROUP – CALIFORNIA.
C. COLOSSIMO-JAIME* is a doctoral level computer scientist and biochemist, who works for a major manufacturer of specialty materials used in the space program and in scientific applications related to the space program.
J.A. SANCHEZ* is a doctoral level electrical engineer working for a large aerospace conglomerate in southern California.
• The names adopted by these authors is a pen name used in any written work associated with the LIFE PHYSICS GROUP, and is designed to protect their professional association with their respective employers.
46