Our world is changing rapidly. It's changing in frequency and energy state. Those mysterious aches that come and go just as mysteriously is just your body struggling to keep up. Each strand of DNA can transmit and receive frequencies. Like a fractal antenna. It's how life adapts to new conditions, it's all keyed into the intelligence of All that is.
When I was young, a photo was like a signature, evidence recorded in a place and time. Court convictions based on photos were not uncommon. Sure even in the emulsion film days photos could be airbrushed and rephotographed, and all kinds of tricks of photography could be employed. It was hard, but an expert could always tell what was not natural or real. Hollywood developed all kinds of techniques based filming models some more convincing than others. Stanley Kubrick was probably the best with filming with miniatures but closeups including people he built huge sets.
Technology is changing rapidly, drafting and design went digital in the 1970s. That led to computer graphics and then George Lucas harnessed Silicon Valley tech to create CGI movies to make it easier to create fantastic film effects for movies that didn't depend on miniature models. Cartoons began to use computer graphics but the labor force was expensive so cartoons like the Simpsons were rendered from story boards into video in Korea where the labor rate was cheaper. Video games took these techniques even further by incorporating the laws of physics into creation of videos so the images behaved like the real world to make the game play more realistic. But all that required hundreds of programmers and artists to create those video games.
The way AI has been introduced doesn't feel organic. It's way too fast for a natural progression in technology. Is it possible AI Large Language Models tech was created far earlier than we know and it's been in use for war gaming and other agency projects of DARPA and its equivalents around the world?
This has gone so far, so rapidly, nobody trusts any image, still or video, because with just a few sentences into any of the publicly available AI chatbots anyone can create very convincing images at high definition
Large language model AI began to make a serious debut in the public sphere about the same time various rumors were floated that white hats claimed they had videos of prominent people caught in heinous acts and crimes. It's diluting the space of what can be presented as evidence. It's an old technique, at least as old as the first search engines. If there's a word the controllers don't want people to investigate they will create a movie of the same name and every search result will center around a movie by the same name, and you can't find what you are looking for. When I did the viral project on bankers resigning in 2012, Google was a binary search engine. It would give you what you asked for, plus a lot of stuff you didn't but in that extraneous data was a lot of interesting stuff. Now search engines give you what it thinks you want, based on statistical data research, and it's getting harder and harder to find the gems of data. The Russian search engine Yandex, which was based on the original Google search engine still has that nature.
A couple of years ago I asked ChatGPT to create a Python program, for the iPhone running Pythonista. I asked it to create me a script that would read the notifications a ride share app issued and write them to Apple notes. What it gave me absolutely floored me as to the quality of the code. Not only did it write very clean Python code, it even knew the API calls of that particular iPhone app, which I didn't know even existed. The implication was clear, pursuing my old career as a programmer was not a viable long term plan. I also saw that a lot of programmers of, how shall we say, grade B skills, are in real danger of losing their jobs. In 2026 we are now seeing that play out as hundreds lose their tech jobs at Oracle, Amazon and other tech firms. These people were making 6 figure salaries. Businesses and governments see this as cutting costs, and providing more centralized control. That control is illusionary, as it will also empower the creative individual. That is just the nature of tools.
So what to do, when everything you were good at, can be done by an AI? The only real choice is to do what AI cannot do. Create. Build. Design. Dream. Creation of every kind. Help humanity. Teach the next generation. Learn to use your inner technology that doesn't rely on NVIDIA or TESLA chips.
I'll give you a simple example that doesn't get too woo woo for my newer readers. I moved to Morocco in 2013 and shared a villa in Cabo Negro with Caleb. I didn't know Heather and her step mother would soon be staying in the empty ground floor rooms. Caleb and I had rooms up on the upper deck that had views on the Mediterranean views. Caleb got the winter rate and it was cheaper than what I now pay for my tiny one bedroom apartment. Moroccan homes have built in couches, essentially a masonry couch with a custom leg and back cushions. We had set up our computers in the living room on make shift tables because that's where the internet connection was. I remember there was one day that HATJ asked us to help her search for some piece of data. I used my usual approach which I felt was logical. HATJ was "pulling" keywords with her intuition and getting results way quicker than I ever could. I was stunned!
That was the point I stopped viewing this Morocco adventure as blog reporting and realized I had so much to learn! I didn't know squat. She was using her heart tech to pull in keywords from the all.
Most of the people who turned up in Morocco had much more knowledge than I did about subtle energies and frequencies and nearly every woo subject. I spent most of my adult life as a techie. But they also had the disadvantage of getting it from schools of thought dating back to antiquity containing what isn't really necessary. So while at first I felt like the dumbest person in the room. It would ultimately be less I had to unlearn and be an actual advantage.
I still don't feel like I know much, but I do try to share what I do know. And sometimes that changes when I get a better comprehension.
